|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NM: Residents get update on gun bill legislation
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A bill requiring background checks for the sale of guns at gunshows and over the internet may get a hearing in 2019, according to gun control advocates who spoke at a Voices of Los Alamos meeting Monday night.
Members of a group affiliated with Everytown, called Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, were there, along with Taryn Nix, a political advisor to State Rep. Stephanie Garcia Richard.
Moms Demand Action representatives urged the audience to get involved, to meet with their legislators about the bill and other gun control related issues. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(9/29/2017)
|
| The fed already has dealers running background checks at gun shows and any dealer on the internet has to send the firearm to a local dealer to process, for the buyer!!!! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
