|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Moms Demand Action Founder: ‘The NRA Is Losing’
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"In a New Year’s Day interview with Salon magazine, Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America founder Shannon Watts said the media is misreading things — Moms Demand Action is not losing, but the NRA is."
"According to Salon, Watts suggested 'the NRA and the gun lobby in general' succeeded in controlling gun debate language in a way that gives those defending the Second Amendment the appearance of victory. In reality, however, she says the public actually supports the gun control lobby’s position over the NRA’s."
"Watts says the NRA also seizes on differences between racial and ethnic groups and 'exploit [divisions] within different communities and manipulate information and try to paint a picture that’s not accurate.'" ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(1/5/2015)
|
Watts's up with this ? Like others of her ilk, this pundit's zeal leads her to engage in blatant "transference" of her, (and their) MO to millions of law-biding, (and actively supportive of police) americans. Accusing them of the "dirty deeds" these power-greedy groups employ as SOP.
Watt's up with your group not targeting the criminal use of guns in our minority urban areas ? Watt's up with you not supporting federal prosecution for "felons in possession" ? Watt's up with you not insisting gangs and gang violence need to be addressed at its source - our borders ? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
