|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NY: Deputy Sheriff Guns Down Groundhog After Animal Charges at Him
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A Carroll County Sheriff’s deputy who shot and killed a groundhog on a Maryland highway in Sykesville is under fire after someone who saw the incident posted the video on social media. “This just happened. And I’m soooo distraught!!!!” Justyna Olkowska said on Facebook. “Like I cannot believe I just witnessed this. If you’re not an animal lover, you won’t understand my pain ...” During the nearly two-minute-long video, the groundhog charges toward the deputy several times. The officer shoots animal once and then a second time when the animal gets up again and turns toward him. |
| Comment by:
jac
(5/9/2018)
|
Too bad the ground hog wasn't charging the liberal animal lover with the camera.
It's a groundhog. Get over it. They are one step above a rat and totally worthless. The meat is not worth eating.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
