|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MA: Was Fatal Brockton Stabbing Murder or Self Defense?
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Kirsten Smith smoked a cigarette in her backyard Friday afternoon as her boyfriend bled out and his body grew cold inside the home they shared. That’s how a prosecutor described the scene when Brockton police officers arrived at the Maguire Road home, about 1:07 p.m. Now, the question both sides have to answer is – was it murder or self defense? Smith, 53, was arraigned Monday in Brockton District Court on a charge of murder, but her defense attorney claims she was strangled by the man prosecutors say is the victim. |
| Comment by:
hisself
(6/27/2017)
|
"smoked a cigarette in her backyard Friday afternoon as her boyfriend bled out and his body grew cold"
Must have been a helluva long cigarette! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
