|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NYT Blames NRA
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The New York Times is going to tell you exactly who is responsible for the Orlando shooting massacre -- and it is the NRA.
Omar Mateen slaughtered 49 innocent people. He broadcast and pledged his loyalty to the terrorist Islamic State group. The red flags prior to his jihad attacks were numerous.
We don't need the New York Times to tell us who is responsible. |
Comment by:
laker1
(6/18/2016)
|
Gun shop owner called FBI on Omar, Disney called FBI on Omar, FBI investigates and takes him off watch list, has security job, but its the NRA's fault. |
Comment by:
jac
(6/18/2016)
|
The NYT is as dishonest as Clinton.
Actually, if it is anybody's fault other than the murderer, I submit that it is the liberals that promulgated and maintain victim disarmament zones |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/18/2016)
|
And the sun rose in the East this morning. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|