|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(10/19/2020)
|
It's OK when the liberals go judge shopping.
Now that it goes against them they complain. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/19/2020)
|
3 word answer to that: Jack Bertrand Weinstein, who grabbed every possible 2A case this century, for the purpose of ruling against Freedom, before finally retiring at the age of 98. "I'm the senior judge here, I do what I want". (and you thought Ginsberg hung around for a long time)
He'd been an anti-gun federal judge longer than we've had a federal Gun Control Act, and he had been the Chief Justice of his district since 1993.
The 2nd Circuit famously overturned him when he tried to pretend the PLCAA didn't exist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_B._Weinstein |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege. [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)] |
|
|
