|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
A Firearms Sanctuary Movement in Washington State? Game On!
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Voters in King County, the most populated administrative district which includes Seattle and the nightmarish unbalanced blue wave entitled snarky counterproductive idealism of radical politics and billions of tax dollars allocated towards the construction of a socialist dystopia, are partially responsible for the adoption of damaging legislation punishing law-abiding gun owners, while inadvertently (or not), enabling a burgeoning criminal enterprise. (No offense to the trio of wealthy software tycoons, and a pretentious trust fund baby, who spent over $5 million dollars to ensure the anti-gun campaign would equate to victory on election night.)
|
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(11/26/2018)
|
| There are a lot of red flags being shown by Oath Breaking politicians everywhere in this nation, that their could be some serious criminal undermining of our Constitutional form of government. Deprivation of rights, doing away with due process. These Oath Breakers think that somehow it's ok to assume more, and more power that is "not" delegated to them by the Constitution. You want a perfect example of a "Slippery Slope", this is it.. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
