|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
The cost associated with the American Dream
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
... "Take the Second Amendment — the right to bear arms. A good example of the amendment’s misinterpretation is provided by the National Rifle Association."
"When the Constitution was written we were at war with England, Indians were fighting with the colonists, and the nation was expanding west. Everyone was a member of one militia or another. Everyone carried some type of weapon, either a pistol or a long rifle. Farmers carried their weapons out to their fields with them or to town. Their weapon was their life or their family’s life."
"Today’s world is a totally different time and place."
"The arms some people want to bear are assault rifles and automatic weapons. They say they are hunters and target shooters. ..." ... |
| Comment by:
xqqme
(4/8/2015)
|
The author admitted something he didn't realize...
"Everyone carried... or a long rifle."
The long rifle was superior to the normal military arm of the day, the musket.
It shot straighter and farther, and was deadlier. It was used to effect by the colonists to win the WAR. (Bill Cosby described it well)
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=bill+cosby+americans+and+british+routine&FORM=VIRE5#view=detail&mid=B2E9D726D3CEDBA1CD41B2E9D726D3CEDBA1CD41 |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(4/8/2015)
|
I posted civil responses to this ****, TWICE.
Neither has appeared.
Time will tell, but it appears that this publication refuses to recognize cogent rebuttal. |
| Comment by:
Mike the Limey
(4/8/2015)
|
"Falsehood will fly, as it were, on the wings of the wind, and carry its tales to every corner of the earth; whilst truth lags behind; her steps, though sure, are slow and solemn...."
I think that pretty much covers the writer's contribution to the "gun debate" & everything else poured out by the proponents of victim disarmament. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(4/8/2015)
|
Our founding fathers didn't define or delimit "arms" the populace might bear without being infringed. IOW, they foresightedly envisioned a "balance of power" between government and populace. Advance this some 150 years and "what's changed " about this philosophy ? Americans have access to light infantry weapons equivalent to its government. Or they would, if certain groups and departments of government weren't working overtime in crafting "regulations/laws" prohibiting the "balance of power" crafted by our founders.
liberty, freedom and safety must be purchased in a dear coin. The blood of tyrants and patriots. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
