|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
xqqme
(8/30/2019)
|
| An odd ruling, in that the court ruled that if the public perceives that it is safer, they let the law stand... no analysis at all as to whether the public is, indeed, safer. Any judge who rules on the emotions, rather than the facts, should be impeached and removed. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/30/2019)
|
“If a ban on semi-automatic guns and large-capacity magazines reduces the perceived risk from a mass shooting, and makes the public feel safer as a result, that’s a substantial benefit,” the 12-page majority opinion said.
Such brazen thumbing of the nose at an enshrined fundamental right with the scope of precedent established by Miller, Heller and McDonald is breathtaking.
How the public feels overrules constitutional commands?
I seem to remember the public in Arkansas feeling that the Little Rock Nine shouldn't be permitted to attend Little Rock Central High in 1957. Is Brown v. Board of Education therefore illegitimate?
This arrogance cannot be allowed to continue unaddressed. |
|
|
