|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NV: WCSD reaches resolution in pro-gun T-shirt lawsuit
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The student was disciplined twice for wearing pro-gun clothing. The first time he was disciplined was on Nov. 20, 2017, for wearing a shirt from the Sparks Black Rifle. The shirt depicted the store’s logo, which included silhouettes of a rifle and handgun.
He was disciplined again on March 12 for wearing a shirt promoting the Firearms Policy Coalition. The shirt showed the words “Don’t Tread On Me,” along with a coiled snake.
The student’s teacher told him to cover the shirt, and he responded by telling his teacher that he was free to express himself through his clothing.
The teacher then allegedly responded by saying he could have his “Second Amendment rights when he turns 18,” according to the lawsuit. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/7/2018)
|
(Cue Pacino in "The Devil's Advocate") - "OH! Ya GOT me! Ya GOT me!" |
Comment by:
mickey
(7/7/2018)
|
Not much of a win, if the stipulated judgment requires the miscreants to pay some of your attorney fees with other people's money. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|