|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Senator Manchin: ‘Use The Weight Of The Government’ For Better Gun Control
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"During a July 26 appearance on CBS News’ Face the Nation, Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) acknowledged that [the] alleged Lafayette gunman ... did not do 'anything wrong' in the way he acquired his firearm, yet still posited a need to 'use the weight of the government' to bring about better gun control." ...
-------
Submitter's Note: "Nothing wrong"? Seriously? How about the felony the shooter committed in lying on his 4473 or the multiple felonies he committed being a "prohibited person" in possession of a gun and ammunition? |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(7/28/2015)
|
| Seems to me the senator already has what he wants. It just doesn't work, as we've had ample examples of already this summer! Like most progressive elites he'd rather write legislation than enforce existing laws or work to correct their faults. Not much bandwidth in being a repairman, I suppose. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(7/28/2015)
|
| Seems to me the senator already has what he wants. It just doesn't work, as we've had ample examples of already this summer! Like most progressive elites he'd rather write legislation than enforce existing laws or work to correct their faults. Not much bandwidth in being a repairman, I suppose. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
