|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
UK: Haunted By the Angels Who Kill
Submitted by:
Anonymous
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The giant jail door clanks open slowly. I’m waiting in a small, plain visitor room for a young woman named Erin Caffey. She is led in by a heavily armed guard, which seems almost laughably unnecessary given that she’s only 4ft 11in.
Erin, now 24, has been detained at a high-security prison in Gatesville, Texas, for eight years. She’s blonde, blue-eyed, pretty, softly spoken and she has the voice of an angel.
My first impression is that she seems gentle, sweet and unthreatening, as befits someone from a loving, stable home, someone who had never been in trouble, and who sang in the church choir every Sunday with her parents and two brothers.
COMMENT: "A heavily armed jail guard"? I doubt it. Just as I doubt everything else Piers says. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/2/2016)
|
| Piers is SUCH a dork, isn't he? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
