|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Clinton Aide: Of Course She Doesn’t Want to Abolish the Second Amendment
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
According to Chris Cox, executive director of The National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action, Clinton is wrong on all fronts.
“A majority of Americans support this freedom, and the Supreme Court was absolutely right to hold that the Second Amendment guarantees the fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms,” he said last year. “Hillary Clinton’s extreme views are completely out of touch with the American people.”
Ed.: Of course she doesn't want to repeal it, she just wants to ignore it. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(5/13/2016)
|
| She just wants Australian type of gun registration thus confiscation of all semi-auto rifles. When that does not slow criminals it will be all semi-auto handguns. When that does not work it will be all sniper rifles, (hunting rifles). When that does no work all pump action shotguns and rifles, etc. Just like in Australia, England, France, Germany, Etc. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(5/13/2016)
|
Hillary wants the "Australian Solution," but she doesn't think that damages our second amendment rights.
Because we will still be allowed spitballs.
Meanwhile, just how is this e-mail investigation...."inquiry?" ....going?
Hillary: "Laws for thee, NOT for me." |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| ...If a man lies under oath or procures the lie of another under oath, if he perjures himself or suborns perjury, he is guilty under the statute law. Under the higher law, under the great law of morality and righteousness, he is precisely as guilty if, instead of lying in a court, he lies in a newspaper or on the stump; and in all probability, the evil effects of his conduct are infinitely more widespread and more pernicious. — Teddy Roosevelt - May 12, 1900 |
|
|
