|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Davidson’s Gallery of Guns Offering Exclusive Ruger SR1911 NRA Special Edition
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
As a longtime supporter of the NRA, Davidson’s Gallery of Guns is showcasing their NRA pride by offering a special edition NRA Ruger SR1911 pistol exclusively via Galleryofguns.com and Davidson’s Dealers nationwide! The Ruger SR1911 NRA Special Edition pistol is a modern take on the timeless American single-action classic, chambered in the venerable .45 ACP cartridge. The frame features a striking red anodized finish, complemented by red laminate grips proudly featuring the NRA logo. The black nitride slide is adorned with an engraving of the NRA seal and text of the Second Amendment on the left face, and is fitted with fixed Novak 3-dot sights.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/19/2018)
|
The perfect open-carry fashion accessory for sticking it in their mugs! It should be borne in a minimalist holster so as not to screw up the "in-your-face" effect. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
