|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
jac
(5/8/2021)
|
Too bad.
On the other hand, the people paying for the classes will get to keep their money. |
Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(5/8/2021)
|
Some of these license trainers are the biggest enemies of the 2nd amendment. They sell out our rights so they can make a buck helping people get a stupid license they don't need. Was it Jefferson who said there were those who were traitors, who would help fasten chains to their countrymen. |
Comment by:
shootergdv
(5/8/2021)
|
The State loses the permit fees too . So what ? If not enough folks feel the need for the classes, the Instructors outta work can look for another line of work like everybody else that gets laid off ! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|