|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(9/10/2019)
|
| Expansion...You see.. one foot in the door, and they move for more, with no end in sight until their goal of total unconstitutional confiscation has been achieved. Serve not Rule. |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/10/2019)
|
Why stop there? Why not let anyone that has a beef against you ask the courts to take away your rights?
That's what the politicians want. More ways to disarm the entire population.
Except, the criminals will still have their guns. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/10/2019)
|
jac -
"Except, the criminals will still have their guns."
Allow me to rephrase that:
"Except, the criminals AND THE GOVERNMENT will still have their guns." |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
