
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
VA: Social worker killed client during knife fight, Pulaski County authorities say
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Pulaski County authorities released more information Thursday about an altercation earlier this week that left one man dead and another injured — saying it occurred as a community services worker conducted a home visit and was attacked by his client, who was in the midst of a mental health crisis.
Both men were stabbed multiple times with knives and the client died, Commonwealth’s Attorney Justin Griffith said.
...
The prosecutor said that no criminal charges would be placed, calling the client’s death a justifiable homicide that occurred in self-defense. |
Comment by:
shootergdv
(2/3/2023)
|
Guessing the social worker wishes he'd brought a gun to the knife fight. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|