|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
RI: Richmond Council Postpones Second Amendment Sanctuary Vote
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
After considerable discussion, Town Council members agreed to postpone a vote on a resolution declaring the town a Second Amendment sanctuary until a larger venue could be found to accommodate all residents who wished to speak. The resolution topped Tuesday’s council meeting agenda, and the council chambers was filled beyond capacity, forcing many people to wait outside. The discussion came on the heels of Monday’s vote in Hopkinton to approve the resolution.
|
Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/13/2019)
|
To anti-2A ninnies, any law they deem "reasonable" or "sensible" cannot possibly infringe a constitutional right, by virtue of its "reasonableness" or "sensibility".
Which, of course, is absolutely ridiculous. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|