|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/14/2015)
|
School papers, making MSM libtards look good...
"Campus Carry Law Fees" = Administration vows to increase security to deal with imaginary threat. |
| Comment by:
jac
(10/14/2015)
|
What a load of ****.
There is no valid reason to increase campus security because licensed concealed carry individuals will be allowed to carry a gun on campus.
If anything, the campus will become safer, reducing the need for whatever security force currently exists.
UT is opposed to legal concealed carry and is simply introducing stupid objections without any merit. Another example of "the sky is falling" liberal mentality that has not occurred anywhere else and won't happen in Texas. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
