|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Kamala Harris Propooses "Red Flag" to Take Guns From "Racists"
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Democratic presidential candidate and Sen. Kamala Harris (Calif.) has taken the concept of “red flag” gun confiscation laws a step further with a proposal to take guns away from white nationalists who might commit a hate crime. According to a policy proposal on her campaign website Wednesday, Harris said she would work to “combat and disarm violent hate” from white supremacists by pushing for legislation to give courts the ability to issue “Domestic Terrorism Prevention Orders” to take away the guns of “a suspected terrorist or individual who may imminently perpetrate a hate crime.”
|
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(8/19/2019)
|
| Do what has to be done to control criminals, but only up to the point of where you start depriving law abiding citizens of their Constitutional rights. Innocent until proven guilty, due process of law should not be skirted around in order to achieve the desired results. Honor the Oath of Office, and stay within the confines of the Constitution. These elected servants were givin the opportunity to "Serve," not "Rule" |
| Comment by:
jac
(8/19/2019)
|
Democrats consider all white conservatives to be racists.
By their definition, they can disarm half the population, and it won't be the half that is committing the crimes. |
| Comment by:
jac
(8/19/2019)
|
You won't find this on the national news.
The gun grabbers would disarm law abiding citizens like this, leaving them vulnerable to thugs and criminals. |
| Comment by:
jac
(8/19/2019)
|
| Sorry, above post is not for this article. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
