|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(5/2/2020)
|
"The Liberal Party promised some sort of buyback program in the last election, something that could cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars."
It's good to know that Canada has money to throw away even with the collapse of the oil sector and the economy in the toilet.
From everything that I read about this incident the killings took place over a number of hours. He could have done the same damage with a double barrel shotgun and a single action revolver.
|
| Comment by:
jac
(5/2/2020)
|
"The Liberal Party promised some sort of buyback program in the last election, something that could cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars."
It's good to know that Canada has money to throw away in the midst of the collapse of the oil industry and the entire economy in the toilet.
From everything I read, this incident took place over a number of hours. He could have done the same damage with a double barrel shotgun and a single action revolver. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/2/2020)
|
| Hopefully they will have the same success rate as NY and MA. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
