|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(11/8/2018)
|
Neither of them will stop a rifle bullet, and that seems to be the weapon of choice in these mass shootings.
The only defense against a mass shooting is a good guy with a gun, which is unlikely given the liberal mindset to make schools victim disarmament zones. |
| Comment by:
jac
(11/8/2018)
|
There is no place for comments to the article. And no discussion in the article on ways to prevent or contain a school shooter such as arming school staff and making it known that the staff is armed.
Totally false security. When will the liberals figure out that the only real security is a good guy with a gun? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
