![Keep and Bear Arms](/images/clear.gif)
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/10/2018)
|
Pennsylvania law already requires a carry permit to have a handgun in the passenger compartment of a vehicle, loaded or not.
This bill would hamstring a lawfully obtained carry permit - what's a person to do, unload the piece every time s/he gets into a car? No, that's not the idea. The idea is to prevent as many permit holders from carrying firearms as possible by placing a legal impediment into their continuity of lawful movement. To remain within the law, permit holders would disarm but the dirtballs who would shoot them over a traffic dispute would not.
Ridiculous, and just another example of how fatuous Democrats are, and why anything they propose should simply be ignored. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|