|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NV: Sheriff is wrong about Second Amendment
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Second Amendment was conceived against a background of hostility toward a standing army and at a time when reliance on a militia was adequate. It was thought that the people needed to be armed so that a militia would be available should the need arise.
Today, people neither keep nor bear arms as part of a militia. Therefore, the arms they keep are not protected by the Second Amendment. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(6/30/2016)
|
| Another talking head that knows nothing about the subject at hand. The militia is out there with/or without the Gov. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(6/30/2016)
|
"Today, people neither keep nor bear arms as part of a militia. Therefore, the arms they keep are not protected by the Second Amendment."
WRONG.
We, the People, are part of the unorganized militia, per the Uniform Militia Act of 1792.
Also (*SIGH!*) the second amendment states "the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Notice it does NOT say the right of the MILITIA, but THE PEOPLE?
Right?
How is this unclear?
|
| Comment by:
punch
(6/30/2016)
|
| Florida has an organized militia. Go to http://www.flmilitia.org/ |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Some of the worst abuses of government force in recent years were precipitated by technical and victimless gun-law violations. For example, the BATF claimed that the Branch Davidians possessed machine guns without paying the required federal tax and filling in the proper registration forms. So a tax case worth less than $10,000 led to a 76-man helicopter, machine gun, and grenade assault on a home in which 2/3 of the occupants were women and children. — Dave Kopel and Dr. Michael S. Brown, Prohibition Fever, NationalReview.com |
|
|
