|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Liam Neeson Blasted For 'Rank Hypocrisy'
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"Action movie star Liam Neeson is being accused of lacking brains and 'rank hypocrisy' for his comments blasting gun ownership in America – while making a career appearing in movies featuring … guns."
"'The rank hypocrisy of an actor who uses guns in his films and attacks gun ownership at the same time is way over the top. I guess you don’t need brains to act,' said Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation. 'All you have to do is read the script.'"
"Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, was also not impressed by the comments from Neeson, who appeared in 'Schindler’s List." ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(1/14/2015)
|
The hypocrisy of hollywood has existed for years. ts contempt for mainstream america's values and mores were the "stuff of filmdom legends". Even today its licentious history is ballyhooed on rescreenings.
This latest ham -- a mere shade of his predecessors' - isn't any less hypocritical; in his actions, statements, or cashing the checks. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
