|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/6/2019)
|
Yeah, well, that was about a clear as mud.
Using that many words and circumnavigation makes understanding your rights worse, not better.
Regarding one's home:
1) obvious lethal aggression from another resident with no avenue of retreat, or
2) person breaks and enters and continues to advance when confronted, or
3) person with no right to be there refuses to leave and signals violent intent
Those are the basic three. Under those conditions it's likely that no charges would be filed.
In all cases, you must be able to demonstrate that authorities were called at the earliest possible opportunity.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/6/2019)
|
| (stink) |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
