
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(10/26/2021)
|
Proof that gun confiscation does not stop crime AND more proof that the racist "FOID" law is racist. Most of these confiscations are probably for not having the unconstitutional "FOID" card and are probably against blacks. And since these confiscations help the manufacturers immensely, by removing product from the marketplace, that's why the nra never really fought the unconstitutional "FOID" law. NRA is a longtime deep state controlled entity that DOES NOT fight for liberty or the 2nd amendment reliably. It supported the lautenberg ban AND the current gun confiscation laden NDAA (until 3 days after the NDAA passed and it had to issue a statement appearing to oppose). |
Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(10/26/2021)
|
Read the story, the ultra racist chicago powers (government and media) BRAG about how fast they can get to 10k gun confiscations (from blacks is what they MEAN). |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|