
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
xqqme
(2/27/2017)
|
So that's how they went around the Miller decision, which indicated that without any evidence that short barreled shotguns had utility for warfare, SCCOTUS could not say such were protected by the Second Amendment.
Since the "look-a-like" firearms only resemble weapons of war, they aren't protected by the Second... |
Comment by:
dasing
(2/27/2017)
|
2A protects all firearms !! |
Comment by:
dasing
(2/27/2017)
|
No court can make law, of any kind! |
Comment by:
laker1
(2/27/2017)
|
Thus the Winchester Model 97 and Model 12, the Beretta 92 handguns, the M1 and M1 Carbine all actual weapons of war would also be banned. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(2/27/2017)
|
We won Heller, a few other cases, got Trump in office over Hillary .... the fight goes on and on. Keep your powder dry and stay wide awke; the tyrants are still barking at our heels. The fight never ends .............. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/27/2017)
|
The U.S. 4th Circuit is 10-4 commie-to-conservative.
It's now a smaller version of the U.S. 9th. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|