|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MO: And so the shooters win
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Another mass school shooting. We know the drill. We will charge the alleged assailant with first-degree murder — not a deterrent, but it makes some people feel good. Self-defense classes will be offered — they don't really work, but they make people feel better. There will be makeshift memorials of teddy bears, flowers, candles and balloons — they don't change anything, but they make people feel better.
What has disappeared in the last year or so is any cry for prevention. What can we do to make sure this doesn't happen again? |
| Comment by:
dasing
(1/26/2018)
|
| There ain't nuttin you can do to prevent this, if you only go after law-abiding people!!!!!!! |
| Comment by:
jac
(1/26/2018)
|
If you really want to stop school shootings, get rid of the prohibition on firearms in schools by law abiding citizens.
It should be obvious to anyone that the prohibition does not prevent those with malicious intent from bringing a firearm into schools. It only emboldens them as they know they will not encounter armed resistance and are unlikely to be shot themselves. Note that the last few school shooters surrendered to authorities. Clearly getting shot dead was not their intent.
It is clear to me that the responsibility for many of these school shootings rests clearly on the liberal politicians that prevent law abiding citizens/teachers/administrators from possessing the means to defend themselves and their students. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
