|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
xqqme
(5/29/2019)
|
Roseburg, once self-described as the "Timber Capital of the World", is surrounded by National Forest... but with a twist. Much of that forest land was once held by the Oregon and California Railroad.
Congress authorized land grants to firms building a rail system in the region in 1866, and much work was done, resulting in a US Supreme Court ruling of 1915 that the developers had substantially completed the project and were entitled to the land.
Eventually, local governments began receiving proceeds of timber sales "in perpetuity". But recently, with the decline in timber harvest due to environmental and other restrictions, that revenue has dramatically declined.
Now Roseburg wants to forfeit a revenue source? How stupid can pols get? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
