|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jughead
(11/7/2017)
|
| i dont think the second has anything to do with hunting. more i read the more it seems to be to keep a rogue nation in line. the gov is supposes to be working for us not the other way around |
| Comment by:
dasing
(11/7/2017)
|
| THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN ASSUALT RIFLE...assault troops use select fire (machine guns) weapons. NOT assault weapons!!!!!!! |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(11/7/2017)
|
The whole of the English Language is now under assault. It's crazy.
The term "assault rifle" is actuall a "term of art." If I am attacking someone with a bolt action .22LR rifle, a single shot Flintlock Kentucky Long Rifle, or a Garand, I'm "assaulting" them .... so maybe what I'm using is an "assault rifle?" A Kentucky Flintlock is....an.... ASSAULT RIFLE?
No, assault rifles --meaning AR type --- are actually used for shooting contests, sports, and, yes, HUNTING. There are other calibers available (.308 and .300 blackout) that are even better calibers for hunting the big stuff. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. — Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888). |
|
|
