|

|
300 Win Mag vs 338 Win Mag vs 338 Lapua Mag: It’s Magnum Time
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
When it comes to putting down large game at longer ranges, most hunters will agree that the 300 Winchester Magnum, 338 Win Mag, and 338 Lapua Magnum are more than up to the task. They all have a relatively flat trajectory and carry enough kinetic energy to get the job done on North American big game like mule deer, elk, moose, and bears. |
Grassroots Legislative Report—June 8, 2026
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
What’s New—Florida: Tradition Community Association, a homeowners association (HOA) in Port St. Lucie, adopted a rule banning lawful firearm carry; Illinois: Several bills were introduced in May, but none passed before the legislature adjourned on June 1; New Hampshire: HB609 was tabled with a 182-160 vote; HB1279 and HB1365 awaiting the governor’s approval; Vermont: S.239 failed in the House; Virginia: Private sale background checks are no longer available or required. |
GA: Local 4-H shooters take aim at state .22 rimfire match
Submitted by:
Corey Salo
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Emanuel County 4-H .22 rimfire teams traveled to Rock Eagle 4-H Center in Eatonton Sat., May 2, to compete in the annual State 4-H .22 Rimfire Match.
Georgia 4-H offers the .22 Rimfire Sporter program as a premier competitive shooting discipline for youth. Designed to teach marksmanship and responsible firearm handling, the program follows Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) rules. Shooters may compete individually or in teams of three to four members in either the telescopic or open sight class. Competitors fire a total of 60 shots from prone, sitting/kneeling, and standing positions at distances of 25 and 50 yards. The competition includes both slow-fire and rapid-fire rounds that test accuracy, speed, and shooting fundamentals.
|
6mm Creedmoor vs. 6.5 Creedmoor: Clash of the Creedmoors
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The similarities between the 6mm Creedmoor (also 6mm CM or 6mm CRDMR) and 6.5 Creedmoor (also 6.5 CM or 6.5 CRDMR) don’t stop at the names. Both cartridges offer serious speed, accuracy, and long-range performance. Whether you’re weighing your options for championship rifle shooting or trying to choose a cartridge for long-range varmints or antelope, both of these Creedmoors should be top contenders. |
More Cases Waiting in Wings
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Sometime between now and the end of June, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to hand down rulings on a pair of Second Amendment cases which could have considerable impact on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, and those who use controlled substances. |
Last 30 Days'
Newslinks Archives:
June 6, June 5, June 4, June 3, June 2, June 1, May 30, May 29, May 28, May 27, May 26, May 25, May 23, May 22, May 21, May 20, May 19, May 18, May 16, May 15, May 14, May 13, May 12, May 11, May 9
Newslinks Archives by Month:
/, 8/2000, 9/2000, 10/2000, 11/2000, 12/2000, 1/2001, 2/2001, 3/2001, 4/2001, 5/2001, 6/2001, 7/2001, 8/2001, 9/2001, 10/2001, 11/2001, 12/2001, 1/2002, 2/2002, 3/2002, 4/2002, 5/2002, 6/2002, 7/2002, 8/2002, 9/2002, 10/2002, 11/2002, 12/2002, 1/2003, 2/2003, 3/2003, 4/2003, 5/2003, 6/2003, 7/2003, 8/2003, 9/2003, 10/2003, 11/2003, 12/2003, 1/2004, 2/2004, 3/2004, 4/2004, 5/2004, 6/2004, 7/2004, 8/2004, 9/2004, 10/2004, 11/2004, 12/2004, 1/2005, 2/2005, 3/2005, 4/2005, 5/2005, 6/2005, 7/2005, 8/2005, 9/2005, 10/2005, 11/2005, 12/2005, 1/2006, 2/2006, 3/2006, 4/2006, 5/2006, 6/2006, 7/2006, 8/2006, 9/2006, 10/2006, 11/2006, 12/2006, 1/2007, 2/2007, 3/2007, 4/2007, 5/2007, 6/2007, 7/2007, 8/2007, 9/2007, 10/2007, 11/2007, 12/2007, 1/2008, 2/2008, 3/2008, 4/2008, 5/2008, 6/2008, 7/2008, 8/2008, 9/2008, 10/2008, 11/2008, 12/2008, 1/2009, 2/2009, 3/2009, 4/2009, 5/2009, 6/2009, 7/2009, 8/2009, 9/2009, 10/2009, 11/2009, 12/2009, 1/2010, 2/2010, 3/2010, 4/2010, 5/2010, 6/2010, 7/2010, 8/2010, 9/2010, 10/2010, 11/2010, 12/2010, 1/2011, 2/2011, 3/2011, 4/2011, 5/2011, 6/2011, 7/2011, 8/2011, 9/2011, 10/2011, 11/2011, 12/2011, 1/2012, 2/2012, 3/2012, 4/2012, 5/2012, 6/2012, 7/2012, 8/2012, 9/2012, 10/2012, 11/2012, 12/2012, 1/2013, 2/2013, 3/2013, 4/2013, 5/2013, 6/2013, 7/2013, 8/2013, 9/2013, 10/2013, 11/2013, 12/2013, 1/2014, 2/2014, 3/2014, 4/2014, 5/2014, 6/2014, 7/2014, 8/2014, 9/2014, 10/2014, 11/2014, 12/2014, 1/2015, 2/2015, 3/2015, 4/2015, 5/2015, 6/2015, 7/2015, 8/2015, 9/2015, 10/2015, 11/2015, 12/2015, 1/2016, 2/2016, 3/2016, 4/2016, 5/2016, 6/2016, 7/2016, 8/2016, 9/2016, 10/2016, 11/2016, 12/2016, 1/2017, 2/2017, 3/2017, 4/2017, 5/2017, 6/2017, 7/2017, 8/2017, 9/2017, 10/2017, 11/2017, 12/2017, 1/2018, 2/2018, 3/2018, 4/2018, 5/2018, 6/2018, 7/2018, 8/2018, 9/2018, 10/2018, 11/2018, 12/2018, 1/2019, 2/2019, 3/2019, 4/2019, 5/2019, 6/2019, 7/2019, 8/2019, 9/2019, 10/2019, 11/2019, 12/2019, 1/2020, 2/2020, 3/2020, 4/2020, 5/2020, 6/2020, 7/2020, 8/2020, 9/2020, 10/2020, 11/2020, 12/2020, 1/2021, 2/2021, 3/2021, 4/2021, 5/2021, 6/2021, 7/2021, 8/2021, 9/2021, 10/2021, 11/2021, 12/2021, 1/2022, 2/2022, 3/2022, 4/2022, 5/2022, 6/2022, 7/2022, 8/2022, 9/2022, 10/2022, 11/2022, 12/2022, 1/2023, 2/2023, 3/2023, 4/2023, 5/2023, 6/2023, 7/2023, 8/2023, 9/2023, 10/2023, 11/2023, 12/2023, 1/2024, 2/2024, 3/2024, 4/2024, 5/2024, 6/2024, 7/2024, 8/2024, 9/2024, 10/2024, 11/2024, 12/2024, 1/2025, 2/2025, 3/2025, 4/2025, 5/2025, 6/2025, 7/2025, 8/2025, 9/2025, 10/2025, 11/2025, 12/2025, 1/2026, 2/2026, 3/2026, 4/2026, 5/2026, 6/2026, 3/3004, 1/3006, 3/3006
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|